The stated problem may not be the underlying problem. Programme proposals can focus on visible symptoms while important structural, institutional, behavioural, or stakeholder conditions remain poorly understood.
← Who we work with
Funders and Programme Owners
Understand the system around an investment before deciding where resources can create value. SustematiQ helps funders and programme owners understand stakeholder needs, programme assumptions, ecosystem conditions, risks, evidence gaps, and potential effects so funding and programme decisions can be made with a stronger view of the system they are trying to influence.
Common challenges
Funding decisions shape systems, but the evidence available to make them is often incomplete.
Different stakeholders may define success differently. Beneficiaries, delivery organisations, public institutions, researchers, communities, companies, and funders can have different needs, incentives, and perspectives on what should change.
Programme assumptions can remain untested. An intervention may depend on particular behaviours, relationships, institutions, capabilities, or adoption conditions that have not yet been validated.
Average impact can conceal unequal outcomes. Strong overall indicators may still hide groups experiencing limited benefit, greater burden, exclusion, or unintended consequences.
Learning can remain trapped inside individual projects. Evidence generated across funded initiatives may not be structured in a way that improves future programme design or resource allocation.
Future conditions can change programme relevance. Technology, markets, policy, institutions, stakeholder behaviour, and societal needs may evolve during the life of a funding programme.
How SustematiQ helps
Build stronger intelligence around what to fund, what to learn, and what to change.
Problem and System Intelligence: Examine the wider system surrounding the issue, including stakeholders, institutions, relationships, needs, resources, and structural conditions.
Stakeholder Intelligence: Understand who is affected, what different groups need, where influence and vulnerability sit, and where perspectives or incentives diverge.
Programme Logic and Assumption Analysis: Examine how programme activities are expected to create outcomes and which assumptions, dependencies, or external conditions need to hold.
Research and Evidence: Gather and synthesise relevant academic, programme, stakeholder, market, institutional, and primary research evidence.
Programme Learning and Evaluation: Understand what appears to be working, for whom, under what conditions, and what remains uncertain.
Societal Effects and Trade Offs: Examine potential benefits, burdens, risks, vulnerabilities, and differences between stakeholder groups.
Strategic Foresight: Explore how changing technologies, institutions, markets, policy, and societal conditions could affect programme priorities over time.
Decision Support: Translate evidence into funding priorities, programme choices, decision briefs, portfolio discussions, or questions for further investigation.
What you can take away
A clearer evidence base for programme design, funding decisions, and future learning.
Problem and system map showing stakeholders, institutions, relationships, resources, needs, and conditions surrounding the issue.
Stakeholder intelligence brief showing who is affected, what different groups need, and where influence, dependency, or vulnerability sits.
Programme logic and assumption review showing which conditions need to hold for the intervention to produce intended outcomes.
Evidence and programme learning synthesis showing what current research and funded activity suggest and where important gaps remain.
Effects and trade off analysis showing how potential benefits, burdens, and risks may differ across stakeholders.
Portfolio or opportunity intelligence brief helping compare needs, intervention areas, emerging opportunities, or funding priorities.
Future intelligence brief identifying developments that could materially affect programme relevance or future investment decisions.
Decision brief or structured funding session bringing evidence, uncertainties, stakeholder consequences, and options into a form suitable for programme or portfolio decisions.
Common ways we can help
Relevant services for this audience.
Programme, Ecosystem and Societal Intelligence
Understand how actors, resources, relationships, interventions, impacts, and trade offs fit together, where gaps exist, and where action could create greater value.
Research and Evidence
Build the evidence needed for an important question through primary research, evidence reviews, stakeholder research, qualitative and quantitative analysis, and structured synthesis.
Strategic Foresight and Future Intelligence
Explore how technologies, stakeholder behaviour, institutions, markets, and societal conditions may evolve so decisions made today are more resilient.
Decision Briefs and Decision Sessions
Turn complex evidence and different stakeholder perspectives into clearer options, priorities, trade offs, and practical next steps for decision makers.
Understand the problem before deciding where resources should go.
Tell us about the programme, funding area, portfolio, or societal challenge you are working with. We can help identify which stakeholders, assumptions, evidence gaps, and system conditions deserve attention before the next decision.