SustematiQ works with organisations facing complex questions involving markets, stakeholders, research, programmes, technology, adoption, and societal impact. Here we show selected examples of the questions we have worked on, the evidence we used, what we learned, and how that understanding supported action.
Show what happened, not merely who the logo belongs to.
Explore selected workSelected work
Projects organised around the question that needed answering.
No case studies are published yet; selected work will appear here when permissioned evidence is ready.
Situation: What was happening and why did it matter?
Question: What did the organisation need to understand or decide?
Approach: What research, stakeholder intelligence, analysis, or decision support did SustematiQ provide?
Insight: What became clearer through the work?
Outcome: How was the evidence used, and what happened next where this can be credibly stated?
Capabilities used: Relevant SustematiQ services or methods.
Partner or client: Named where permission exists. Otherwise describe the organisation or context without revealing confidential information.
What our work can look like
Different questions call for different ways of working.
Market and Opportunity Intelligence
Research supporting decisions about emerging markets, technologies, opportunities, demand, and competing approaches.
Stakeholder Intelligence and Adoption Readiness
Understanding who matters, what different stakeholders need, and which conditions may enable or obstruct implementation.
Programme and Ecosystem Intelligence
Mapping actors, relationships, needs, resources, gaps, programme effects, and intervention opportunities.
Research and Evidence
Generating or synthesising evidence around a defined organisational, societal, technological, or innovation question.
Foresight and Future Intelligence
Exploring plausible change and what different futures could mean for current decisions.
Decision Support
Translating fragmented evidence into clearer options, uncertainties, consequences, and implications for decision makers.
Research and Innovation Partnerships
Contributing stakeholder, adoption, validation, societal, or decision capabilities within collaborative projects and consortia.
Product Pilots and User Research
Testing Mate, FoQus, or related human capability technologies with real users and institutional partners.
How we present evidence
Clear about what the work can and cannot show.
Question before activity: We explain what needed to be understood rather than presenting a list of workshops, interviews, or outputs.
Method before claim: Where an insight depends on research, we explain enough of the approach for the reader to understand where the conclusion came from.
Outcome before prestige: A recognised partner logo is useful, but it should not substitute for explaining what SustematiQ actually contributed.
Uncertainty remains visible: If the work produced evidence rather than a definitive conclusion, we say so.
Confidentiality is respected: Sensitive client information, participant data, unpublished findings, and proprietary material should only appear with appropriate permission.
From project to learning
Some project findings can produce broader insights that are useful beyond a single engagement. Where appropriate and permitted, selected lessons can become research notes, frameworks, case insights, or other publications within SustematiQ Insights.
Selected collaborations
Context matters as much as recognition.
Where permission exists, we can recognise organisations we have worked with through research projects, commercial assignments, pilots, funded programmes, consortium work, or strategic collaboration.
Logos should support the case evidence rather than replace it. Each prominent collaboration should ideally connect to a short explanation of the relationship or work performed.
No collaboration logos are displayed yet; future recognition will be accompanied by context about the relationship or work performed.
Working on a question that resembles something here?
Tell us what you are trying to understand, decide, introduce, evaluate, or change. We can determine whether an existing approach is relevant or whether the problem requires something different.