SustematiQ publishes research, practical insights, frameworks, and evidence from our work on stakeholder intelligence, responsible technology adoption, decision making, human capability, attention, and societal change.
Our editorial approach
Different claims need different kinds of evidence.
We distinguish research, interpretation, frameworks, and perspective so readers can understand what kind of claim they are reading.
What we publish
Six content pillars
Stakeholder Intelligence
How stakeholders, needs, influence, dependencies, incentives, vulnerability, trust, and adoption conditions shape innovation and intervention.
Responsible Innovation and Technology Adoption
How technology enters organisations and society, why technical readiness is not enough, and how agency, privacy, governance, and stakeholder conditions affect responsible adoption.
Decision Making Under Complexity
Evidence, uncertainty, consequences, competing responsibilities, trade offs, and ways technology can support judgement without replacing it.
Human Capability and Technology
How technology can strengthen understanding, judgement, attention, and capability rather than increasing dependence or reducing human control.
Attention, Focus and Digital Wellbeing
Research and product thinking around attention, cognitive transitions, short resets, microbreaks, breathing, healthy digital engagement, and the development of FoQus.
Systems, Society and Sustainable Progress
How benefits, burdens, power, vulnerability, institutional conditions, and unintended consequences interact across complex societal systems.
Content types
Different kinds of evidence
Research
Work grounded primarily in published evidence, original research, or structured analysis.
Research Note
A shorter examination of a specific finding, question, or evidence base.
Framework
A structured way of understanding or analysing a recurring problem.
Case Insight
A practical lesson emerging from a project, pilot, programme, or observed implementation challenge.
Product Research
Evidence and design reasoning informing Mate, FoQus, or future SustematiQ technologies.
Perspective
An interpretation or argument from SustematiQ that should not be mistaken for an empirical research finding.
Decision Brief
A concise synthesis of evidence, uncertainty, options, stakeholders, and implications around a defined question.
Featured work
Featured research and thinking
Selected work where research, stakeholder evidence, or product development has produced an insight worth examining in greater depth.
Product research
Research behind our products
Mate and FoQus are developed through a combination of research, product testing, and direct user learning. We publish selected evidence and design reasoning so the assumptions behind the products remain open to examination.
Mate
Decision burden, commitments, prioritisation, consequences, cognitive load, human judgement, personal intelligence, and responsible automation.
FoQus
Attention, cognitive transitions, microbreaks, breathing, low pressure interaction, digital wellbeing, capability transfer, and healthy engagement.
Research transparency
How we communicate evidence
1
We distinguish evidence from interpretation.
2
We make important assumptions and limitations visible.
3
We avoid presenting early product hypotheses as established scientific findings.
4
Where evidence is uncertain or contested, we say so.
5
We update our thinking when stronger evidence or real world learning gives us reason to do so.
Working on a question this connects with?
If something here connects with a decision, programme, research question, technology, or system you are working with, tell us about it. Our research is most useful when it helps someone understand a real problem more clearly.